<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The BBC&#8217;s Gaza conflict</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2009/01/25/the-bbcs-gaza-conflict/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2009/01/25/the-bbcs-gaza-conflict/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2009/01/25/the-bbcs-gaza-conflict/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2009/01/25/the-bbcs-gaza-conflict/#comment-39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hilarious. Mark Thompson subjected himself to a two fingers up humiliation on BBC Breakfast this morning when the journalists showed him exactly what they thought by beaming the appeal up behind him whilst he was explaining exactly why the BBC would never show it. You can see it here:&lt;a href=&quot;http://duckrabbit.info/blog&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; www.duckrabbit.info/blog&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilarious. Mark Thompson subjected himself to a two fingers up humiliation on BBC Breakfast this morning when the journalists showed him exactly what they thought by beaming the appeal up behind him whilst he was explaining exactly why the BBC would never show it. You can see it here:<a href="http://duckrabbit.info/blog" rel="nofollow"> </a><a href="http://www.duckrabbit.info/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.duckrabbit.info/blog</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man in a Shed</title>
		<link>http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2009/01/25/the-bbcs-gaza-conflict/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Man in a Shed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2009/01/25/the-bbcs-gaza-conflict/#comment-38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem is that the people of Gaza are used as hostages by both sides. Hence aid becomes, with a quick hijack, welfare from Hamas. Pictures of suffering become reasons why Israel must be condemned, boycotted and forced to make concessions that will result in its eventual annihilation.

So the BBC is right to stay out of this.

But why should the UK govt used UK armed forces to distribute aid ? Then neither the use of suffering for propaganda would result ( and at the same time making generating that suffering less attractive ), and it would not strengthen Hamas. It would just help the suffering people.

The hypocrisy is Labour MPs putting down early day motions about charities, as a way of diverting attention from the lack of effective action from the UK govt and others.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that the people of Gaza are used as hostages by both sides. Hence aid becomes, with a quick hijack, welfare from Hamas. Pictures of suffering become reasons why Israel must be condemned, boycotted and forced to make concessions that will result in its eventual annihilation.</p>
<p>So the BBC is right to stay out of this.</p>
<p>But why should the UK govt used UK armed forces to distribute aid ? Then neither the use of suffering for propaganda would result ( and at the same time making generating that suffering less attractive ), and it would not strengthen Hamas. It would just help the suffering people.</p>
<p>The hypocrisy is Labour MPs putting down early day motions about charities, as a way of diverting attention from the lack of effective action from the UK govt and others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2009/01/25/the-bbcs-gaza-conflict/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2009/01/25/the-bbcs-gaza-conflict/#comment-37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BBC did not report on Gaza did it, it used the information it had from Israel or anyone with a mobile phone from Gaza. This has to be the first time that the BBC did what it was told and stayed out of Gaza, the reporters said we are not allowed into Gaza by Israel, what Gaza is now run by a tin pot government in Israel sad so sad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BBC did not report on Gaza did it, it used the information it had from Israel or anyone with a mobile phone from Gaza. This has to be the first time that the BBC did what it was told and stayed out of Gaza, the reporters said we are not allowed into Gaza by Israel, what Gaza is now run by a tin pot government in Israel sad so sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Sedgemore</title>
		<link>http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2009/01/25/the-bbcs-gaza-conflict/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Sedgemore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2009/01/25/the-bbcs-gaza-conflict/#comment-36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jo - I have a slight problem with the comparison between Barbara Plett and Alan Johnston.

Plett was cleared of delivering a tearful eulogy to Yasser Arafat, which was the basis of many of the formal complaints made to the BBC. But she was found guilty of breaching the guidelines on due impartiality for good reason. The emotional content of Plett&#039;s report was unprofessional, and for many her behaviour was inappropriate as it distracted from the reporting, and needlessly irritated a lot of people.

With Johnston, there is indeed a powerful humanity in his reporting, but, from what I&#039;ve seen of it, he has never overstepped any lines. On a political level I&#039;ve disagreed with much of Johnston&#039;s analysis of the situation in Palestine, but this hasn&#039;t affected my admiration and respect for him as a professional journalist.

Plett has a long and distinguished career as an international correspondent, but it was right that she was censured for the Arafat incident.

I agree with your comments regarding over-strict adherence to editorial rules.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jo &#8211; I have a slight problem with the comparison between Barbara Plett and Alan Johnston.</p>
<p>Plett was cleared of delivering a tearful eulogy to Yasser Arafat, which was the basis of many of the formal complaints made to the BBC. But she was found guilty of breaching the guidelines on due impartiality for good reason. The emotional content of Plett&#8217;s report was unprofessional, and for many her behaviour was inappropriate as it distracted from the reporting, and needlessly irritated a lot of people.</p>
<p>With Johnston, there is indeed a powerful humanity in his reporting, but, from what I&#8217;ve seen of it, he has never overstepped any lines. On a political level I&#8217;ve disagreed with much of Johnston&#8217;s analysis of the situation in Palestine, but this hasn&#8217;t affected my admiration and respect for him as a professional journalist.</p>
<p>Plett has a long and distinguished career as an international correspondent, but it was right that she was censured for the Arafat incident.</p>
<p>I agree with your comments regarding over-strict adherence to editorial rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: blog.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-25 01:20:07 by W3 Total Cache -->