<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leveson inquiry: the tabloids don&#8217;t get it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2011/11/23/leveson-inquiry-the-tabloids-dont-get-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2011/11/23/leveson-inquiry-the-tabloids-dont-get-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:06:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law and Media Round Up &#8211; 28 November 2011 &#171; Inforrm&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2011/11/23/leveson-inquiry-the-tabloids-dont-get-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5585</link>
		<dc:creator>Law and Media Round Up &#8211; 28 November 2011 &#171; Inforrm&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/?p=6772#comment-5585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Index on Censorship&#8217;s John Kampfner explains why &#8220;the tabloids don&#8217;t get it&#8220;; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Index on Censorship&#8217;s John Kampfner explains why &#8220;the tabloids don&#8217;t get it&#8220;; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin Hall</title>
		<link>http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2011/11/23/leveson-inquiry-the-tabloids-dont-get-it/comment-page-1/#comment-5550</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/?p=6772#comment-5550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hope that you are right when you say that Leveson gets it. I wish that they would focus more upon the BBC, Sky &amp; ITV&#039;s role in legitamising newspaper stories. Each morning they fill their headlines with &quot;Fact Fact Fact&quot; ... Says the Daily Mail etc. If Leveson could rule that the major TV news channels should be held to account when they help to create frenzy behind what is just an un-checked story source things might start to improve.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that you are right when you say that Leveson gets it. I wish that they would focus more upon the BBC, Sky &amp; ITV&#8217;s role in legitamising newspaper stories. Each morning they fill their headlines with &#8220;Fact Fact Fact&#8221; &#8230; Says the Daily Mail etc. If Leveson could rule that the major TV news channels should be held to account when they help to create frenzy behind what is just an un-checked story source things might start to improve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: blog.indexoncensorship.org @ 2013-05-22 21:12:33 by W3 Total Cache -->