Comments on: Is transparency bad for science?

By: The Index on Censorship Science debate – Is transparency bad for science? #datadebate |

Thu, 23 May 2013 18:08:16 +0000

[...] let us repost her summary of the event which took place last tuesday below. You can read it in full here, and you can catch a video of the whole event [...]

By: Bills to watch in Parliament | AMRC blog

Bills to watch in Parliament | AMRC blog — Mon, 20 May 2013 09:19:25 +0000

[...] You can read more about these issues in this summary of a debate held last year on this topic with B… [...]

By: What’s science got to hide? Part II | Naturally Selected

What’s science got to hide? Part II | Naturally Selected — Tue, 18 Sep 2012 12:13:46 +0000

[...] open data, peer review, and who should be given access to raw data. Index on Censorship has already summed up the discussion nicely, but we’ll share with you a few of our favourite snippets of [...]

By: Making “nullius” public | through the looking glass

Making “nullius” public | through the looking glass — Mon, 19 Dec 2011 10:07:23 +0000

[...] is devoted to questions of science. To launch it, they held a debate at Imperial College: Data Debate: Is transparency bad for science? (video embedded at bottom of this [...]

By: The data debate: is transparency bad for science? « Wellcome Trust Blog

The data debate: is transparency bad for science? « Wellcome Trust Blog — Wed, 14 Dec 2011 12:04:23 +0000

[...] can read a summary of the event over on the Index on Censorship blog and watch the full debate in the video above. Share this [...]

By: Index on Censorship data debate report and video « simon denegri's lay review

Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:33:48 +0000

[...] You can read a report of last week’s Index on Censorship’s debate about data starring Mark Walport and Baroness O’Neill among others, here. [...]

By: The Index on Censorship Science debate – Is transparency bad for science? #datadebate « SAGE Connection

Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:08:39 +0000

[...] let us repost her summary of the event which took place last tuesday below. You can read it in full here, and you can catch a video of the whole event here. “The philosopher Baroness [...]

By: Perfectly formed for funding « Purse String Theory

Perfectly formed for funding « Purse String Theory — Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:08:37 +0000

[...] because nobody can predict who the big stars will be,” said pharmacologist David Colquhoun at a debate in London earlier this week. He recommended a system in which research teams were limited to two or [...]

By: A million squid you say? « A Man of Badly Encoded Character

A million squid you say? « A Man of Badly Encoded Character — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 16:22:13 +0000

[...] blew up a bit the other night with the revelation at a London event that UCL library spends over one million pounds sterling a year on titles from one single publisher [...]

By: Request Initiative » Debate highlights conflict between FoIA transparency and scientific confidentiality

Wed, 07 Dec 2011 18:20:40 +0000

[...] Index On Censorship’s “Is Transparency Bad For Science?” debate was timely arriving in the wake of the second release of emails hacked from the [...]