Digital

Google Transparency Report reveals record high government requests

Governments and courts in 31 countries requested data from 33,634 Google users or accounts in the second half of 2012 according to the company’s latest Transparency Report.

While the number of data requests rose by two per cent — from 20,938 to 21,389 — the proportion of requests Google fully or partially complied with dropped by one point — to 66 per cent.

The US led the pack in number of requests, accounts specified and percentage honoured. American law enforcement agencies issued 8,438 requests for data from 14,791 accounts, 88 per cent of which Google fully or partially complied with. Other countries issuing more than 1,000 requests in late 2012 were India, France, Germany, the UK and Brazil.

The 1986 Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) compels Google to comply with government requests. This was the company’s first Transparency Report to breakdown the proportion of requests by legal process used.

68 per cent of requests came via subpoenas — without a warrant — under the ECPA. Warrants are not required for access to data more than 180 days old. 22 per cent of requests came with a warrant, and the remaining 10 per cent were uncategorised.

“We believe the US laws should be updated,” William Echikson, Head of Free Expression Policy and PR for EMEA at Google, told Index. “Our users deserve to have their online correspondence and documents afforded the same legal protections from government access as they get for their physical documents.”

According to the report, Google reviews each request to ensure its compliance with “both the spirit and the letter of the law” and sometimes tries to narrow the data requested.

“Debates about government surveillance should start with data,” Echikson added.  “Our disclosures are only a tiny sliver of what’s happening on the Internet at large.”

Echikson said he hopes more companies and governments will join Google to increase transparency and keep citizens informed by releasing similar data. Competitors and collaborators alike are doing just that, but to varying degrees and with varying success.

In 2012, Dropbox, LinkedIn and Twitter shared similar statistics. The Electronic Frontier Foundation’s (EFF) 2012 report “Who Has Your Back” rates 18 companies on transparency regarding government requests for user data. These ratings take into account whether companies tell their users about government data demands and whether they fight for user privacy in courts and congress. Only Sonic.net, an ISP based in California, earned full stars in each category of EFF’s privacy and transparency report.

Google’s latest Transparency Report does not include content removal requests. Company officials said those numbers will be released separately in several months time.

Brian Pellot is the digital policy adviser at Index.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google Plus
  • Delicious
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Email
  • RSS

7 Comments

  1. Posted 07Mar13 at 8:01 pm | Permalink
    legalady

    The FBI is “not required to get court approval to issue an NSL.” In order to have the needed data granted, it is sufficient for the agency to enclose a document proving relevance to an “authorized investigation to protect against international terrorism or clandestine intelligence activities.” The lack of court oversight makes extensive abuse and misuse of these highly secretive requests possible. The feds can use the letters to bypass courts and exert extreme secrecy over communication providers, civil rights groups like the Electronic Frontier Foundation have contended that they represent one of the most “frightening and invasive” excesses of post-9/11 national security efforts. That’s why me and my friends started using anonymous and alternative search engines like Gibiru.com, DuckDuckGo and Ixquick, which protect your privacy and do not censor the information you read online.

  2. Posted 11Jul13 at 6:05 am | Permalink

    Its like you read my mind! You appear to know
    a lot about this, like you wrote the book in it or something.
    I think that you could do with some pics to drive the message home a bit, but other than that, this is great blog.

    An excellent read. I’ll definitely be back.

  3. Posted 22Sep13 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    Nice blog here! Also your web site loads up very
    fast! What host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host?
    I wish my web site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  4. Posted 28Nov13 at 3:46 pm | Permalink

    Howdy very nice web site! Guy. Great. Excellent. I am going to take note of your web site in addition to go ahead and take nourishes moreover? We are grateful to get numerous helpful tips the following inside the post, we end up needing exercise additional strategies with this value, appreciation for discussing.

  5. Posted 28Feb14 at 1:09 am | Permalink

    First off I want to say fantastic blog! I had a quick question which I’d like to ask if you don’t mind.

    I was interested to find out how you center yourself
    and clear your head before writing. I’ve had trouble clearing my thoughts in getting my ideas out.

    I truly do take pleasure in writing but it just seems like
    the first 10 to 15 minutes are generally wasted
    simply just trying to figure out how to begin. Any suggestions or hints?
    Many thanks!

  6. Posted 18Mar14 at 4:37 am | Permalink

    I just love your site, it’s filled with fresh and relevant articles and have a very nice eye catchy design! Some posts really helped me in my work, so thanks for that!!

  7. Posted 06May14 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    What we should do ??
    we can’t stop ourself from using google. Even it reveals our privacy to government officials

6 Trackbacks

  1. [...] Google Transparency Report reveals record high government requests (indexoncensorship.org) [...]

  2. [...] one. Letting governments handle the online legal dilemma is not OK. Transparency reports from Google or Twitter clearly indicate a rise in government requests for data and censorship and if national [...]

  3. [...] handling of our data is likely to infringe on our freedom of expression. Google and Twitter do a good job of this with their transparency reports and other initiatives, but many companies like Skype, [...]

  4. [...] and reply to critics in one’s own virtual space,” he said. According to a recent Transparency Report published by Google, Brazil tops the list of countries that regularly removed digital content. In [...]

  5. [...] and respond to critics in one’s possess practical space,” he said. According to a recent Transparency Report published by Google, Brazil tops a list of countries that regularly removed digital content. In [...]

  6. [...] companies including Google, Twitter and most recently Microsoft issue regular reports showing how many copyright removal [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*